Best Image Format for Websites and SEO: WebP vs AVIF vs JPEG vs PNG

Your Image Format Choice Is a Ranking Factor

Every image on your website is a choice, and that choice has consequences. Pick the wrong format and you're forcing visitors to download hundreds of kilobytes of unnecessary data before your page even finishes loading. That wasted bandwidth translates directly into slower pages, worse Core Web Vitals scores, and lower search rankings.

Google has made it unambiguous: page speed is a ranking signal, and images are the single largest contributor to page weight on most websites. According to HTTP Archive data, images account for roughly 50% of the average webpage's total byte size. Choosing the right image format is one of the highest-leverage optimizations you can make, and it costs you nothing except a few minutes of setup.

This guide gives you a thorough, practical breakdown of every major image format — JPEG, PNG, WebP, AVIF, SVG, and GIF — so you know exactly which one to reach for in every situation.

At a Glance

If you want the shortest possible answer before diving in:

• For photos and complex images: Use WebP with a JPEG fallback. AVIF is better but browser support still requires careful handling.
• For logos, icons, and graphics with transparency: Use WebP (lossless mode) or PNG as fallback.
• For illustrations and logos: Use SVG whenever possible — it scales infinitely and weighs almost nothing.
• For animations: Use WebP animation or CSS animations. Avoid GIF entirely.
• Legacy fallback: JPEG for photos, PNG for graphics with transparency.

The single best thing you can do right now: convert your existing JPEG and PNG images to WebP using our image converter. You'll typically cut file sizes by 25–35% for JPEG replacements and 15–25% for PNG replacements with no perceptible quality loss.

Format Overview: What You're Actually Working With

Before comparing formats head-to-head, it helps to understand what each one actually is and how it was designed.

JPEG (JPG)

JPEG — Joint Photographic Experts Group — was standardized in 1992 and remains the most widely deployed image format on the internet. It uses lossy compression, which means it permanently discards image data during the encoding process. The encoder identifies information your eye is least likely to notice (fine color detail, high-frequency texture) and removes it to achieve smaller file sizes.

JPEG is extraordinarily well-supported and genuinely excellent for photographs. Its weakness is that it lacks transparency support and handles sharp edges, text, and flat color areas poorly — these features produce visible blocking artifacts. Every time you save a JPEG, you lose a little more quality, which makes it a poor choice for images you'll edit repeatedly.

PNG

PNG — Portable Network Graphics — was created in 1996 as an open, patent-free alternative to GIF. It uses lossless compression, meaning every pixel is preserved exactly. This makes it ideal for graphics, screenshots, logos, and any image with text or sharp geometric edges, because there is zero degradation.

The tradeoff is file size. A photograph saved as PNG will often be five to ten times larger than the same image saved as JPEG. PNG fully supports transparency (alpha channel), which JPEG cannot do. PNG-8 supports a limited 256-color palette (similar to GIF), while PNG-24 supports full 16 million colors with an alpha channel.

WebP

WebP was developed by Google and released in 2010. It supports both lossy and lossless compression, as well as transparency and animation — meaning it can replace JPEG, PNG, and even GIF with a single format. At equivalent visual quality, WebP typically produces files 25–35% smaller than JPEG and 15–25% smaller than PNG.

Browser support is now excellent: Chrome, Firefox, Safari (since version 14), Edge, and Opera all support WebP natively, covering well over 95% of global web traffic. If you're not already serving WebP, you're leaving performance on the table. Use our WebP converter to start converting your images today.

AVIF

AVIF — AV1 Image File Format — is the newest format in mainstream use, derived from the AV1 video codec developed by the Alliance for Open Media. It delivers dramatically better compression than WebP and JPEG, often 40–50% smaller than JPEG at equivalent quality. AVIF also supports HDR, wide color gamuts, lossless compression, and transparency.

The catch is that browser support, while improving, is not yet universal. Chrome (since v85), Firefox (since v93), and Safari (since v16) support AVIF, but encoding can be slow and some older tools don't handle it well. AVIF is the format of the future, and you should start adopting it — but always with a WebP or JPEG fallback.

SVG

SVG — Scalable Vector Graphics — is fundamentally different from every other format on this list. Instead of storing a grid of pixels, SVG stores mathematical instructions for drawing shapes. This means SVG files scale to any resolution without any quality loss whatsoever, making them perfect for logos, icons, illustrations, and any other graphic built from shapes and lines.

A simple logo saved as SVG might weigh 2–5KB. The same logo saved as a high-resolution PNG to look sharp on Retina displays might weigh 50–100KB. SVG is also directly manipulable with CSS and JavaScript, which opens up animation and interactivity possibilities unavailable to raster formats. Always use SVG for vector artwork.

GIF

GIF — Graphics Interchange Format — dates from 1987. It supports animation and transparency, but it's limited to a 256-color palette, which makes it terrible for photographs. A looping GIF of a short video clip can easily weigh several megabytes, where an equivalent WebP animation or short video would weigh a fraction as much.

GIF still dominates social media because of cultural momentum and platform support, but for your own website there is almost never a reason to use GIF. Animated WebP files are typically 64% smaller. If you need an animated clip for a website, use a short .mp4 video with autoplay, muted, and loop attributes — this will be even smaller and smoother.

Detailed Format Comparison Table

| Feature | JPEG | PNG | WebP | AVIF | SVG | GIF | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | Compression type | Lossy | Lossless | Lossy + Lossless | Lossy + Lossless | Vector (N/A) | Lossless (limited) | | Typical file size | Medium | Large | Small | Smallest | Tiny | Very large | | Vs. JPEG (photo) | Baseline | ~5–10x larger | ~25–35% smaller | ~40–50% smaller | N/A | N/A | | Transparency | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Limited (1-bit) | | Animation | No | No (APNG yes) | Yes | Yes | Yes (CSS) | Yes | | Browser support | 100% | 100% | 96%+ | 90%+ | 96%+ | 100% | | HDR / Wide color | Limited | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | | Lossless option | No | Always | Yes | Yes | N/A | N/A | | Re-save quality loss | Yes | No | No (lossless) | No (lossless) | No | No | | Best for | Photos | Graphics, screenshots | Everything | Photos, graphics | Logos, icons | Animated memes | | Worst for | Logos, text | Photos | Nothing significant | Older browsers | Photographs | Everything web |

When to Use Each Format

Use JPEG for Legacy Compatibility

JPEG is the right choice when you need absolute maximum compatibility and you're serving photographs to an audience that might include older devices or browsers where you cannot serve WebP or AVIF. If you're building a site today with modern tooling, you should be using WebP instead — but JPEG remains the correct fallback for the <picture> element.

For JPEG, aim for quality settings between 80–85% in most cases. This range delivers imperceptible quality loss for most viewers while achieving significant compression. Going below 75% starts to produce visible blocking artifacts, particularly around areas of fine texture or high contrast. Use our JPG converter to optimize existing JPEG files.

Use PNG for Screenshots and Pixel-Perfect Graphics

PNG is the right choice when you need guaranteed perfect reproduction of every pixel. This is most relevant for screenshots of software interfaces, step-by-step tutorials where UI text must be legible, and graphics created in pixel art or design tools where lossless preservation matters.

PNG with transparency is also still valid as a fallback format when serving graphics to browsers that don't support WebP or AVIF. For icons and logos in raster format (not vector), PNG-24 gives you full-color transparency support. However, always ask first whether the image should be an SVG instead — for logos and icons, the answer is usually yes. Convert your PNGs to WebP using our PNG converter to save bandwidth without sacrificing quality.

Use WebP as Your Default Format

WebP should be your default choice for virtually every image on a modern website. It handles photographs, graphics with transparency, and even animation — all in one format. The file size savings compared to JPEG and PNG are significant and immediate, and browser support is now broad enough that you don't need to worry about most users.

The only real reason not to use WebP today is if your hosting or CDN pipeline doesn't support automatic conversion, or if you need to serve very old browsers (Safari before version 14, IE11). In those cases, use the <picture> element with WebP as the primary source and JPEG or PNG as the fallback. You can convert any image to WebP using our image converter.

Use AVIF for Maximum Compression

AVIF is the best choice for file size when browser support is not a limiting concern. If your analytics show that your audience primarily uses Chrome and Firefox on relatively recent versions, AVIF can deliver 40–50% savings over JPEG with genuinely superior quality, especially at lower bitrates where JPEG produces obvious artifacts.

The main practical barrier to AVIF today is encoding speed and tooling support. AVIF encoding is significantly slower than JPEG or WebP encoding, which matters if you're processing large volumes of images dynamically. For static sites where you pre-build images at deploy time, this is rarely a problem. Use our AVIF converter to generate AVIF versions of your images and serve them via the <picture> element.

Use SVG for All Vector Content

SVG should be your first instinct for any image that isn't a photograph. Logos, icons, illustrations, diagrams, charts, and UI elements are almost always better as SVG. A single SVG file looks perfect on a 4K display, a budget Android phone, and a printed page — no need for multiple @2x or @3x variants.

SVG files are also text-based, which means they compress extremely well with gzip and Brotli (the text compression your web server already applies). A 5KB SVG file might compress down to 1.5KB over the wire. You can also inline SVG directly in your HTML, eliminating the HTTP request entirely for small icons.

Avoid GIF for Anything New

GIF has no place in a performance-conscious website. If you need an animation for engagement or illustration purposes, use WebP animation if the clip is graphic-style, or an <video> tag with an MP4 source if it's video content. The bandwidth savings can be enormous — a 3MB GIF might become a 300KB WebP animation or a 150KB MP4.

If users are uploading GIFs to your platform and you need to process them, convert them server-side to WebP animations or MP4 before serving. Your users' mobile data plans will thank you.

How Image Format Affects Core Web Vitals and SEO

Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)

LCP measures how long it takes for the largest visible element in the viewport to load. For most websites, this element is an image — typically a hero banner, a product photo, or a featured blog post image. Google uses LCP as one of its three Core Web Vitals, with a target of under 2.5 seconds for a "Good" score.

A hero image served as WebP instead of JPEG will load faster because it transfers fewer bytes. A 500KB JPEG hero might become a 320KB WebP, and on a typical mobile connection that's a meaningful difference. Combine WebP conversion with proper image sizing (not serving a 2000px image when only 800px of width is displayed) and you can dramatically improve LCP. Read our full guide on how to optimize images for website performance for more LCP strategies.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)

CLS measures visual instability — how much content shifts around as the page loads. Images without explicit width and height attributes are a major CLS cause because the browser doesn't know how much space to reserve for them before they load. Always set width and height on your <img> tags, regardless of which format you use.

This is not a format-specific issue, but it's worth mentioning alongside LCP because both are Core Web Vitals and both relate to images. Getting your format right (smaller files, faster loads) helps LCP; setting your dimensions correctly helps CLS.

Total Page Weight and Indexability

Google's crawlers have a crawl budget — a limit on how many resources they'll process for a given site. Pages that are heavy with unoptimized images consume crawl budget more slowly and may be crawled less frequently. While the direct SEO impact of crawl budget is debated for large sites, every optimization that makes your pages lighter and faster is a net positive for how Google perceives your site's quality.

PageSpeed Insights and Image Audits

PageSpeed Insights (powered by Lighthouse) specifically audits image formats and will flag any JPEG or PNG that could be served more efficiently as WebP or AVIF. This "Serve images in next-gen formats" audit is one of the most commonly triggered recommendations for websites that haven't modernized their image pipeline.

Passing this audit not only removes a recommendation from your PageSpeed report, it also demonstrates to Google (and to any technical reviewers) that your site is well-maintained and performance-conscious. Conversion with our image converter is the fastest way to start passing this audit.

How to Convert Between Formats

Converting your existing images to modern formats is straightforward. Our converter supports all the major format pairs:

• JPEG to WebP: Use our jpg-to-webp converter for batch photo optimization.
• PNG to WebP: Use the image converter for graphics and logos with transparency.
• Any format to AVIF: Use our AVIF converter for maximum compression.
• Any format to JPG: Use our JPG converter for compatibility-focused workflows.
• Any format to PNG: Use our PNG converter for lossless output.

For deeper background on why WebP is worth the switch, see our guide on what is WebP format. If you need to go the other direction — perhaps a client needs a traditional format — our WebP to PNG/JPG guide walks you through the options. And for the classic debate between the two legacy formats, our PNG vs JPG guide covers all the edge cases.

Implementation Tips for Serving Modern Formats

Use the <picture> Element for Format Fallbacks

The <picture> element lets you specify multiple image sources and let the browser choose the best one it supports. This is the correct way to serve modern formats while maintaining backward compatibility:

<picture>
  <source srcset="/images/hero.avif" type="image/avif">
  <source srcset="/images/hero.webp" type="image/webp">
  <img src="/images/hero.jpg" alt="Hero image" width="1200" height="630" loading="lazy">
</picture>

The browser reads the <source> elements from top to bottom and uses the first format it supports. AVIF-capable browsers get AVIF. WebP-capable browsers (the vast majority) get WebP. Older browsers fall back to JPEG. Always include the <img> tag as the final fallback — it's also what search engines and screen readers use.

Notice the width and height attributes on the <img> tag. These are essential for CLS prevention. Set them to the intrinsic dimensions of your image, and use CSS to control the displayed size. Modern browsers use these values to calculate aspect ratio and reserve the correct space before the image loads.

Use a CDN with Automatic Format Conversion

If managing multiple format variants for every image sounds tedious, a good CDN can eliminate that work entirely. Cloudflare Images, Cloudinary, Imgix, and Bunny CDN (among others) can all automatically serve the optimal format for each visitor's browser based on the Accept header. You upload one source image and the CDN handles format conversion, resizing, and compression on the fly.

This approach is ideal for content-heavy sites where images are uploaded by users or editors who shouldn't need to think about formats. The CDN layer abstracts all of it. Even if you don't use automatic conversion, a CDN's edge caching ensures your converted images are served from a location geographically close to each visitor, reducing latency.

Implement Lazy Loading

Lazy loading defers the loading of images that are below the fold until the user scrolls toward them. This reduces initial page load time and data usage for visitors who never scroll far. The implementation is a single attribute:

<img src="/images/product.webp" alt="Product name" width="800" height="600" loading="lazy">

The loading="lazy" attribute is supported in all modern browsers and requires no JavaScript. For your hero image — the one most likely to be your LCP element — do not use loading="lazy". Use loading="eager" or simply omit the attribute to ensure it loads immediately. Lazy loading the LCP image is a common mistake that actively hurts your LCP score.

Responsive Images with srcset and sizes

Serving a 2400px image to a mobile user who needs a 400px image wastes enormous bandwidth. The srcset attribute lets you provide multiple sizes and let the browser choose the most appropriate one:

<img
  srcset="/images/hero-400.webp 400w,
          /images/hero-800.webp 800w,
          /images/hero-1200.webp 1200w,
          /images/hero-1600.webp 1600w"
  sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw,
         (max-width: 1200px) 80vw,
         1200px"
  src="/images/hero-1200.webp"
  alt="Hero image"
  width="1200"
  height="630"
>

The sizes attribute tells the browser what rendered size the image will be at various viewport widths, and the browser uses this to select the most appropriate source from srcset. Combining responsive images with modern formats like WebP or AVIF can reduce image data transfer by 60–80% compared to serving a single large JPEG.

Format File Size Comparison: Real-World Numbers

To make the differences concrete, here are realistic file size comparisons for a 1920×1080 photograph at equivalent perceived quality, and a typical logo graphic.

Photograph (1920×1080, high quality)

| Format | File Size | Notes | |---|---|---| | PNG | ~2.8 MB | Lossless; impractical for photographs | | JPEG (quality 90%) | ~850 KB | High quality but large | | JPEG (quality 80%) | ~420 KB | Good web quality | | WebP (quality 80%) | ~280 KB | ~33% smaller than JPEG q80 | | WebP (quality 75%) | ~210 KB | Still excellent quality | | AVIF (quality 60%) | ~170 KB | ~60% smaller than JPEG q80 | | AVIF (quality 50%) | ~120 KB | Impressive at this size |

Logo / Graphic (512×512, transparency)

| Format | File Size | Notes | |---|---|---| | PNG-24 | ~65 KB | Lossless with full transparency | | GIF | ~40 KB | 256 colors only; degraded quality | | WebP (lossless) | ~48 KB | Full quality, ~26% smaller than PNG | | WebP (lossy q80) | ~18 KB | Very small; some quality loss | | AVIF (lossless) | ~35 KB | Excellent quality | | SVG | ~4 KB | If vector source available; far superior |

These numbers will vary based on image content and encoding settings, but the ratios are representative of real-world results. The takeaway is clear: WebP is a substantial improvement over the legacy formats in virtually every scenario, and AVIF pushes savings even further.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is WebP better than JPEG for SEO?

Yes, in a practical sense. WebP files are 25–35% smaller than JPEG files at equivalent quality, which means your pages load faster, your LCP scores improve, and your PageSpeed Insights score goes up. Google has confirmed that page speed is a ranking signal. WebP does not directly affect how Google crawls or indexes your images, but the performance benefits translate into better rankings over time. Use the <picture> element to serve WebP with a JPEG fallback, and you get the best of both worlds.

Which image format does Google prefer?

Google's crawlers can read and index images in JPEG, PNG, WebP, SVG, BMP, and most common formats. For SEO image discovery, format doesn't matter much — what matters is that your images have descriptive filenames, meaningful alt attributes, proper structured data where applicable, and are included in your sitemap. However, Google PageSpeed Insights actively recommends WebP and AVIF over JPEG and PNG, so using modern formats improves your technical SEO scores.

Should I convert all my existing images to WebP right now?

If you have control over your image pipeline and can serve WebP with a JPEG/PNG fallback, yes — converting your most trafficked pages' images is one of the highest-ROI optimizations available. Prioritize hero images, product photos, and any image above the fold. For large image libraries, focus on the pages that drive the most traffic first. You don't need to convert everything overnight; even converting the top 20% of your images by traffic impact will produce meaningful results.

Does AVIF work in all browsers?

Not yet in all browsers, but coverage is growing. As of 2026, AVIF is supported in Chrome 85+, Firefox 93+, and Safari 16+. This covers approximately 90%+ of global web traffic. Internet Explorer does not support AVIF, and some older mobile browsers may not either. The correct implementation strategy is to serve AVIF through the <picture> element with WebP and JPEG fallbacks, so every browser gets the best format it can handle.

What is the best image format for WordPress?

WordPress 5.8 and later natively support WebP uploads, and most modern WordPress themes and page builders handle WebP without issues. For WordPress, your best approach is to use a plugin like ShortPixel, Imagify, or Smush to automatically convert uploaded images to WebP (and optionally AVIF). These plugins also generate responsive image variants and serve the appropriate size to each device. If you're on a managed WordPress host like WP Engine or Kinsta, they often offer built-in image optimization at the CDN level.

Can I use PNG for photographs on my website?

Technically yes, but you should not. A photograph saved as PNG will typically be five to ten times larger than the same image saved as JPEG or WebP, because PNG's lossless compression is not designed for the continuous tonal gradients of photographic content. The only reason to use PNG for a photograph is if you need to preserve it for future editing without any quality loss — in that case, keep your working file as PNG or TIFF, but always export to JPEG or WebP for web delivery.

What image format should I use for social media sharing?

For social media Open Graph images (the preview images that appear when you share a link), JPEG is the safest choice because it's universally supported by all social platforms and their crawlers. Facebook, Twitter/X, and LinkedIn all handle JPEG reliably. Your Open Graph image should be 1200×630 pixels, under 8MB (platforms have varying limits), and saved as JPEG at quality 85%. For the images displayed within social posts themselves, platforms will re-compress your uploaded image regardless of what format you provide, so upload the highest quality source you have.

Conclusion: Start With WebP, Think About AVIF

The image format landscape has consolidated around a clear hierarchy for modern web development. WebP is the practical best choice for the vast majority of images on your site right now — broad browser support, significant file size savings, and versatile enough to replace both JPEG and PNG in a single format. If you haven't migrated your images to WebP yet, that's your most important next step.

AVIF represents the future, and if your tooling and CDN support it, you should start serving it today with appropriate fallbacks. The compression efficiency gains are real and substantial, and browser support is rapidly approaching the level where you can treat it as the default rather than the progressive enhancement.

SVG remains the undisputed choice for any vector content — logos, icons, illustrations — and should be your first instinct before you reach for any raster format. And GIF should be retired from your toolkit in favor of WebP animation or short video clips.

The practical path forward is straightforward: convert your existing images to WebP using our WebP converter, implement the <picture> element with proper fallbacks, add explicit width and height attributes to prevent layout shift, and use loading="lazy" on below-fold images. These four changes alone will measurably improve your Core Web Vitals scores, reduce your bounce rate, and contribute to better search rankings over time.

Image optimization is one of the few areas of SEO and performance where the technical effort is low, the tools are free, and the results are immediate and measurable. There's no reason to leave those gains unclaimed.