Why WebP Matters in 2026
WebP is no longer the experimental format it once was. Developed by Google and released in 2010, WebP spent over a decade as the "format of the future" that not everyone could use because Safari did not support it. That era is definitively over. As of 2026, WebP is supported by every major browser, every major operating system, and most content management systems.
The numbers make a compelling case: WebP produces files that are approximately 25-35% smaller than equivalent JPEG files and approximately 26% smaller than equivalent PNG files, with no perceptible difference in visual quality. For a website serving thousands of images to millions of visitors, these savings translate directly into faster page loads, lower bandwidth costs, and better Core Web Vitals scores.
This guide covers everything you need to know to start using WebP effectively — from understanding the format's capabilities to implementing it across your website, CMS, and development workflow.

WebP Format Capabilities
WebP is not just "smaller JPG." It is a versatile format that combines capabilities previously split across multiple formats:
Lossy Compression
WebP's lossy mode is based on the VP8 video codec's intraframe compression. It produces smaller files than JPEG at equivalent quality levels, with particularly strong performance on photographic content.
- Quality range: 0-100 (similar to JPEG)
- Typical savings: 25-35% smaller than JPEG at equivalent visual quality
- Best for: Photographs, complex images, hero images, product photos
Lossless Compression
WebP's lossless mode produces files that are pixel-identical to the source — no quality loss whatsoever. It typically achieves 26% smaller files than PNG.
- Compression: Prediction-based, using neighboring pixels to predict values
- Best for: Screenshots, graphics, logos, diagrams, any content where exact pixels matter
Transparency (Alpha Channel)
Unlike JPEG, WebP supports full alpha channel transparency in both lossy and lossless modes. This is a significant advantage — you can have lossy compression AND transparency simultaneously, something PNG cannot offer (PNG transparency is always lossless).
- Lossy + transparency: Smaller than PNG with transparency, slight quality reduction
- Lossless + transparency: Pixel-perfect with transparency, smaller than PNG
Animation
WebP supports animation, serving as a modern replacement for GIF. Animated WebP files are significantly smaller than equivalent GIFs while supporting a full color palette (GIF is limited to 256 colors).
- Savings over GIF: 50-90% smaller files
- Color depth: Full 24-bit color (vs. GIF's 8-bit/256 colors)
- Alpha support: Transparent animated images (GIF only supports binary transparency)
Browser Support in 2026
WebP support is now universal across all browsers that matter:
| Browser | WebP Support | Since Version |
|---|---|---|
| Chrome | Full support | Version 17 (2012) |
| Firefox | Full support | Version 65 (2019) |
| Safari | Full support | Version 14 (2020) |
| Edge | Full support | Version 18 (2018) |
| Opera | Full support | Version 11.5 (2011) |
| Samsung Internet | Full support | Version 4.0 (2016) |
| iOS Safari | Full support | iOS 14 (2020) |
| Android Chrome | Full support | Version 25 (2013) |
As of February 2026, WebP is supported by over 97% of web users globally. The remaining 3% consists primarily of users on very outdated browsers or niche environments. For all practical purposes, you can use WebP without a fallback for the vast majority of websites.
If you need to support legacy browsers, use the <picture> element with a JPEG/PNG fallback (covered in the implementation section below).
For a detailed comparison of WebP against newer next-gen formats, read our AVIF vs WebP vs JPEG XL comparison. For background on the format itself, see what is WebP format.
Quality Comparison
WebP vs. JPEG
At equivalent visual quality, WebP files are consistently smaller:
| Visual Quality | JPEG Size | WebP Size | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low (Q60) | 85 KB | 58 KB | 32% |
| Medium (Q75) | 130 KB | 92 KB | 29% |
| High (Q85) | 195 KB | 135 KB | 31% |
| Very High (Q92) | 310 KB | 220 KB | 29% |
| Maximum (Q100) | 680 KB | 490 KB | 28% |
These numbers are for a typical 1200x800 photograph. Actual savings vary by image content — images with smooth gradients and uniform areas see larger savings, while highly detailed textures may see slightly less.
WebP vs. PNG (Lossless)
| Image Type | PNG Size | WebP Lossless Size | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Photograph | 8.2 MB | 6.1 MB | 26% |
| Screenshot | 1.4 MB | 980 KB | 30% |
| Logo (simple) | 45 KB | 32 KB | 29% |
| Diagram (complex) | 320 KB | 240 KB | 25% |
| Icon (small) | 12 KB | 9 KB | 25% |
Pro Tip: For photographs on the web, use WebP lossy mode at quality 80-85. This gives you the best balance of visual quality and file size. For graphics, logos, and screenshots where pixel accuracy matters, use WebP lossless mode. Our WebP converter lets you switch between lossy and lossless modes and preview the results before downloading.
How to Convert Images to WebP
Method 1: Online Converter
The fastest approach for individual files or small batches. Use our WebP converter to convert JPEG, PNG, GIF, or other formats to WebP:
- Upload your image (any common format)
- Choose lossy or lossless mode
- Adjust quality (for lossy mode)
- Download the WebP result
For bulk conversions, our image converter handles batch WebP conversion efficiently.
Method 2: Google's cwebp Tool
Google provides an official command-line encoder:
# Install (macOS)
brew install webp
# Lossy conversion (quality 80)
cwebp -q 80 input.jpg -o output.webp
# Lossless conversion
cwebp -lossless input.png -o output.webp
# Lossy with transparency
cwebp -q 80 -alpha_q 90 input.png -o output.webp
# Batch convert all JPGs in a directory
for f in *.jpg; do
cwebp -q 80 "$f" -o "${f%.jpg}.webp"
done
Method 3: ImageMagick
# Lossy conversion
convert input.jpg -quality 80 output.webp
# Lossless conversion
convert input.png -define webp:lossless=true output.webp
# Batch conversion
mogrify -format webp -quality 80 *.jpg
Method 4: Sharp (Node.js)
const sharp = require("sharp");
// Lossy WebP
await sharp("input.jpg").webp({ quality: 80 }).toFile("output.webp");
// Lossless WebP
await sharp("input.png").webp({ lossless: true }).toFile("output.webp");
// Lossy WebP with transparency
await sharp("input.png").webp({ quality: 80, alphaQuality: 90 }).toFile("output.webp");
Method 5: FFmpeg (For Animated WebP)
# Convert GIF to animated WebP
ffmpeg -i animation.gif -vcodec libwebp -lossless 0 \
-quality 80 -loop 0 output.webp
# Convert video clip to animated WebP
ffmpeg -i clip.mp4 -vcodec libwebp -lossless 0 \
-quality 75 -loop 0 -an output.webp

CMS Integration
WordPress
WordPress has supported WebP natively since version 5.8 (2021). Here is how to make the most of it:
Built-in support: WordPress 5.8+ accepts WebP uploads directly to the Media Library and generates responsive image sizes in WebP format.
Performance plugins: Plugins like ShortPixel, Imagify, and EWWW Image Optimizer can automatically convert your existing JPEG/PNG library to WebP and serve the appropriate format based on browser support.
Theme considerations: Ensure your theme does not hard-code image extensions. Modern themes use WordPress's responsive image functions, which automatically include WebP variants.
Next.js
Next.js's next/image component handles WebP automatically:
import Image from "next/image";
// Next.js automatically serves WebP to supported browsers
<Image src="/photos/hero.jpg" alt="Hero image" width={1200} height={800} quality={80} />;
The framework detects browser support and serves WebP (or AVIF) when possible, falling back to the original format otherwise. No manual conversion needed.
Static Site Generators
For Gatsby, Hugo, Eleventy, and similar static generators, use build-time image processing:
// Eleventy with @11ty/eleventy-img
const Image = require("@11ty/eleventy-img");
async function imageShortcode(src, alt, sizes) {
let metadata = await Image(src, {
widths: [400, 800, 1200],
formats: ["webp", "jpeg"],
outputDir: "./public/img/",
});
// Generates WebP + JPEG at multiple sizes
return Image.generateHTML(metadata, { alt, sizes });
}
CDN-Based Conversion
Many CDNs can convert images to WebP on-the-fly:
- Cloudflare (Polish feature): Automatically serves WebP to supported browsers
- Cloudinary: URL-based format transformation (
f_webpparameter) - imgix: Automatic format negotiation with
auto=format - Vercel (Next.js hosting): Automatic WebP conversion via Image Optimization API
CDN-based conversion is the easiest approach if you do not want to manage the conversion process yourself.
Pro Tip: If your website is behind Cloudflare (free plan or above), enable the Polish feature with WebP support. Cloudflare will automatically serve WebP versions of your images to supported browsers without any changes to your code. This is the lowest-effort way to adopt WebP across an entire site.
Implementation: Serving WebP with Fallback
While WebP support is nearly universal in 2026, if you need to support legacy browsers, use the HTML <picture> element:
<picture>
<source srcset="image.webp" type="image/webp" />
<source srcset="image.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
<img src="image.jpg" alt="Description" width="800" height="600" />
</picture>
The browser checks each <source> in order and uses the first format it supports. The <img> tag serves as the final fallback.
Responsive WebP with srcset
For responsive images in WebP with fallback:
<picture>
<source
type="image/webp"
srcset="image-400w.webp 400w, image-800w.webp 800w, image-1200w.webp 1200w"
sizes="(max-width: 600px) 400px,
(max-width: 1000px) 800px,
1200px"
/>
<img
src="image-800w.jpg"
srcset="image-400w.jpg 400w, image-800w.jpg 800w, image-1200w.jpg 1200w"
sizes="(max-width: 600px) 400px,
(max-width: 1000px) 800px,
1200px"
alt="Description"
width="1200"
height="800"
/>
</picture>
CSS Background Images
For CSS background images, use @supports:
.hero {
background-image: url("hero.jpg");
}
@supports (background-image: url("test.webp")) {
.hero {
background-image: url("hero.webp");
}
}
Or use Modernizr/JavaScript-based detection to add a webp class to the <html> element and target it in CSS.
Animated WebP: Replacing GIF
If you are still using GIFs on your website, switching to animated WebP is one of the highest-impact optimizations you can make:
| Metric | GIF | Animated WebP | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| File size (typical) | 2-10 MB | 200 KB-2 MB | 70-90% smaller |
| Color depth | 256 colors | 16.7M colors | Full color spectrum |
| Transparency | Binary only | Full alpha | Smooth transparency |
| Quality | Dithering artifacts | Smooth gradients | Much better |
Convert GIFs to animated WebP using FFmpeg:
ffmpeg -i animation.gif -vcodec libwebp -lossless 0 \
-quality 80 -loop 0 -preset default animation.webp
For more on creating optimized animations from video, see our guide on how to create GIF from video.

WebP Conversion Best Practices
Choosing Quality Settings
- Photographs for web: Quality 78-85 (lossy). Start at 80 and adjust based on visual inspection.
- Product images: Quality 85-90 (lossy). Slightly higher to preserve detail.
- Graphics and logos: Lossless mode. No quality parameter needed.
- Screenshots: Lossless mode for text clarity.
- Thumbnails: Quality 70-75 (lossy). Smaller display size hides compression artifacts.
- Animated content: Quality 75-80 (lossy). Balance quality with dramatic file size savings.
Preserving Metadata
By default, most WebP encoders strip EXIF metadata. If you need to preserve it:
# cwebp: preserve metadata
cwebp -q 80 -metadata all input.jpg -o output.webp
# Sharp: preserve metadata
await sharp('input.jpg')
.withMetadata()
.webp({ quality: 80 })
.toFile('output.webp');
Color Profile Handling
WebP supports ICC color profiles. For color-accurate images (photography, design), preserve the profile during conversion. For web delivery where file size matters and sRGB is assumed, stripping the profile saves a few kilobytes.
WebP vs. AVIF: The Next Question
Now that WebP is mainstream, AVIF (AV1 Image File Format) is emerging as the next generation. AVIF offers even better compression (20-30% smaller than WebP) but with some trade-offs:
- Encoding speed: AVIF is significantly slower to encode
- Browser support: Slightly behind WebP (Safari added AVIF support in Safari 16.4)
- Max dimensions: AVIF has a default tile size limit of 8192x4320 pixels
- HDR support: AVIF supports HDR natively, WebP does not
For most websites in 2026, WebP remains the practical choice for broad adoption. AVIF is worth considering for high-traffic sites where the extra compression savings justify the encoding complexity. Read our AVIF vs WebP vs JPEG XL comparison for a detailed analysis.
Optimization Workflow Summary
Here is the recommended workflow for adopting WebP across a website:
- Audit current images: Identify your largest image files and highest-traffic pages
- Convert to WebP: Use our image compressor or WebP converter for batch conversion
- Implement serving logic: Use
<picture>elements, CDN auto-format, or CMS plugins - Test across devices: Verify rendering on iOS, Android, and desktop browsers
- Measure impact: Check Core Web Vitals (LCP, CLS) before and after
- Monitor: Set up automated conversion for new images going forward
For additional image optimization strategies, see our guide on how to compress images without quality loss and optimize images for website.
The bottom line: if you are building or maintaining a website in 2026, WebP should be your default image format. The file size savings are too significant to ignore, the browser support is universal, and the tooling is mature. Start converting today and enjoy faster page loads, happier users, and better search rankings.



